We have a slightly different take on RFP’s. As a pay-for-performance PR firm, we seldom fit the prescribed boxes or rigidly required criteria, we look at every RFP as an opportunity to demonstrate our creativity tied to the prospective client’s needs; and in so doing present our capabilities in a fun, visual manner.
As PR pros it may be a little easier for us to get caught up in all the commerciality of Christmas. Even Charlie Brown, a well-meaning people-pleaser got carried away. It is bad enough that the general populace is left with a bad taste in their mouth when they see the retailers as taking advantage of the one time in the year when people are encouraged to be selfless and give.
While pitching the client’s story, PR people work in a similar fashion except that instead of going door to door, they send emails or make calls (mainly send emails). Accordingly, every good PR person knows that pitching to a journalist who is well known to have a “no soliciting” sign is a waste of time and the best that could happen from that situation is if the journalist ignored it instead of subjecting it to public shame. At INK, our bread and butter is ensuring that the clients get the placements they are looking for and as such our whole existence revolves around sending the perfect pitch.
An old adage has warned us that you cannot trust everything that is on the internet. If anything, the current presidential election was proof that this “old” tip still holds true. We already know traditional news sites tend to be at least somewhat biased to one of the two ends of the political spectrum, but why would there be outright fake news?
I realize it’s blasphemous to be a PR pro and agency owner and acknowledge the obvious…that not every client needs outside PR counsel. But if a client has the time or staff, a certain set of PR skills, the resources, and very importantly, a realistic set of goals, then yes, they can do their own PR.
Technology marches down the passing of time evolving and progressing sometimes faster than others. In the past eight years, we have experienced one of the growth spurts of communication using this technology, and it is worth the time to look at how it has affected the role of our leaders in the government and how they have incorporated it into their campaign.
One would think yellow journalism would be long gone by now. First of all, doesn’t yellow journalism only appear in print newspapers? And isn’t it true that supposedly no one reads newspapers anymore? Finally, since we have all these “new” rules on libel and defamation to keep faulty journalism at bay couldn’t one assume that they have been largely doing their job? Unfortunately, it does not seem to be that way.